All Animals Are Equal Peter Singer Conclusion
As singer rightly points out, humans are indeed not truly equal.
All animals are equal peter singer conclusion. All page numbers refer to the article. These are a version of notes i took for my applied ethics students on peter singer’s 1974 article “all animals are equal” from philosophical exchange 1, reprinted as article 14 of hugh lafollette’s ethics in practice: It owes much to the work of philosopher peter singer and his 1975 book 'animal liberation'.
Animal rights and human obligations edited by tom regan and peter singer. If we extend the principle of equality to nonhuman animals, we will see that animal experimentation (and factory farming) are. Peter singer, new york university follow repository citation singer, peter (1974) all animals are equal, philosophic exchange :
I was reading peter singer's article on animal rights and how they should have the same equality as humans but am having troubling boiling down his argument to main premises. The idea of animal rights first arose as a joke, to make fun of women's rights. The belief that the interests of (a member of) one’s own species count for more than the interests of (a member of) another species.
All animals are equal i. Argument for main conclusion 1] beings have interests just in case they are capable of suffering. Singer accepts utilitarianism as an ethical theory 2.
All animals are equal1 by peter singer in recent years a number of oppressed groups have campaigned vigorously for equality. Some will reject singer’s conclusion because it has. What follows are my notes on peter singer’s “all animals are equal”.
All animals are equal by peter singer ira. In recent years a number of oppressed groups have campaigned vigorously for equality. Once we properly understand the idea of moral equality, there is no reason to deny that sentient animals have interests that are equal to human interests.